• Home
  • About
  • Team
  • Contacts
  • Blog

Warren Buffett Premium

  1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. Warren Buffett Premi ...

Portfolio manager’s Letter June 2005

Nasty Warren Buffett premium

Warren Buffett Premium and Richard Losch portfolio manager

In a private conversation at the annual meeting, Warren Buffett indicated that he felt that Berkshire Hathaway was trading below its intrinsic value, but that it was not yet sufficiently discounted for Berkshire Hathaway to start buying the stock on the open market because of the Warren Buffett Premium.

So what is the point at which Berkshire Hathaway will start repurchasing the stock? When there is no Warren Buffett premium while we can only guess what it is today, we know what it was in 2000 when Warren Buffett offered in his Berkshire Hathaway chairman’s letter to buy the stock at $45,000 or less. The table below shows where the buy-in point would be today with the indicated assumptions about Berkshire Hathaway’s intrinsic value’s long-term growth rate. The table assumes a uniform growth rate, and growth in intrinsic value is, of course, never constant. However, over time the lumpiness does tend to average out.

Keep in mind that Berkshire Hathaway’s intrinsic value and the Warren Buffett premium would be a lot higher today if Warren Buffett had been able to invest the $45 billion he has in cash in long-term investments at what he considers a satisfactory rate. So while Berkshire Hathaway’s value may have grown at only 8% to 12% for the last five years, it is likely that it will be able to grow at a somewhat more rapid rate in a different market environment (a bear market).

Table One Berkshire Hathaway Potential Buy-in Price

Based on Growth in Intrinsic Valve of:

Year 6.80% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00% 14.00%
2000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000
2001 $48,060 $48,600 $49,500 $50,400 $51,300
2002 $51,328 $52,488 $54,450 $56,448 $58,482
2003 $54,818 $56,687 $59,895 $63,222 $66,669
2004 $58,546 $61,222 $65,885 $70,808 $76,003
2005 $62,527 $66,120 $72,473 $79,305 $86,644
2nd Half $64,653 $68,765 $76,097 $84,064 $92,709
2006 $66,779 $71,409 $79,720 $88,822 $98,774
2007 $71,320 $77,122 $87,692 $99,481 $112,602
2008 $76,170 $83,292 $96,461 $111,418 $128,366

Assuming that we can tolerate these generalizations, what does the table say? If you assume Berkshire Hathaway’s intrinsic value is growing at a 10% annual rate, the buy-in point at the middle of 2005 will be $76,097. If you assume 12% growth, the buy-in comes in at $84,064.

It is obvious to everyone that the company can no longer sustain its historical growth rate of 23% to 24%. But even at Berkshire Hathaway’s present size, 10% to 12% growth does not seem to be totally unreasonable, what with the leverage it gets from its insurance float, and the Warren Buffett Premium.

For a graphical representation of the data on Table One, see the chart below. The 6.8% line represents the rate of growth of per-share book value for the period since Warren Buffett’s stock purchase offer in March 2000. Warren Buffett has been quoted as saying the Berkshire Hathaway’s intrinsic value has been growing much more rapidly than its book value, so we can use this line as bottom range for the growth in the buy-back price. Actually the bottom of the range must be somewhere above that line since intrinsic value has been growing faster than book value.

Last week Warren Buffett was criticized by Patrick McGurn, senior vice president of Rockville, Maryland based Institutional Shareholder Services, which advises fund managers on governance.

“He has a very iconoclastic view of corporate governance that I don’t think anyone but Warren Warren Buffett could get away with”, says McGurn. “That could come back to hurt them as people look at reinsurance practices at Berkshire Hathaway”.

The Board of Directors, he said “is composed exclusively of business partners and friends — including Microsoft Corp. Chairman Bill Gates …” In addition McGurn says the lack of a successor isn’t a joke …

“Berkshire Hathaway is probably the riskiest company in America today because it’s one heartbeat away from a substantial diminution in value”, he says.

There it is, that nasty Warren Buffett premium again. This issue has come up again and again in the last few years, but just how much of a Warren Buffett premium exists in today’s Price? I would argue that at today’s Price, that Premium is just about zero.

But, “The riskiest company in America?” This would be absurd even if there were a huge Warren Buffett premium in the stock, and there is not. It is too bad for a man in this guy’s position that he never learned to read a balance sheet. In the stock market, anything that is obvious is discounted. As soon as something becomes well known, it is in the stock price, and while it’s probably true that the Warren Buffett premium will not be around forever, the market may have already discounted his exit. So we have to wonder if there really is a Warren Buffet Premium.

The fact is, Berkshire Hathaway holds the world’s largest pile of cash, and the stock is very illiquid. On Friday, June 3, the NYSE traded 147 class A shares and 6,550 class B shares. This represents a total value of something like $30 million. At that rate, Berkshire Hathaway would trade something short of $2 billion worth of stock in a Quarter (assuming 65 trading days in a quarter). This means that Berkshire Hathaway could buy every share of stock traded on the NYSE and do it out of cash flow without dipping into their $45 billion. While Friday’s volume was below current trading levels, it is not too far from the long-term trend. It may well be that the Warren Buffett premium is really a discount.

So in Berkshire Hathaway’s case, a buyback is the real deal. If he wanted to, Warren Buffett could have the stock trade at or above today’s Price until Berkshire Hathaway had purchased every share outstanding (of course, this would take ten years or so, and the stock is not likely to stay this cheap that long). Because of Berkshire Hathaway’s cash and cash flow, Warren Buffett premium buy-in price is effectively an absolute floor. I doubt that there is any other company that could buy its float out of cash flow.

Instead of being “one heartbeat away from a substantial diminution in value,” Berkshire Hathaway at today’s price probably carries less risk than any other publicly traded stock. It is not necessary for Warren Buffett to be here to initiate a buy-back as long as there is someone around who can sign checks.

Buy-back Price = Zero Warren Buffett Premium

At last year’s annual meeting, Warren Buffet said that while the day he dies will be a bad day for him, it will not be a bad day for shareholders. This could be just more of Warren Buffett’s Omaha shtick, but I took it to mean (among other things) that the buy-back price is real and that somewhere in his desk there is an envelope that lists the price and gives instructions to his successor.

As the market price approaches Warren Buffett’s buy-in price, the bottom line is that there is no Warren Buffett premium because Berkshire Hathaway will be buying stock whether Warren Buffett is present or not. In fact, we could see a price increase at his departure because his absence would make a buy-in more likely if the company is without Warren Buffett to make capital allocation decisions.

So what is that buy-in point? This is something that only Warren Buffett and Charlie know, but we can guess that it is somewhere between the 6.8% and 12% lines on the above chart. We know it is above the 6.8% line because Warren Buffett has said that intrinsic value is growing faster than book value, and we know that it is not between the 12% line and the 14% line because the stock has traded in that area several times in the last five years and there has been no offer from Berkshire Hathaway to buy the stock.

Table Two indicates that the operating portion of Berkshire Hathaway has been growing rapidly in the last five years. Total revenues grew at a rate of 21% per year, operating earnings at 20.8% per year, and cash flow (which I, have defined for this exercise as reported earnings plus growth of the insurance float) at 17%. These figures are not that far from the numbers that Berkshire Hathaway has been turning out for the last 20 years, but with 2004 revenue of $74 billion, Berkshire Hathaway is simply too big to grow at anywhere near 20% in the long term future.

Table Two Berkshire Hathaway Growth 1999 – 2004

Based on Growth in Intrinsic Valve of:

  1999 2004 Growth Rate
Per Share Book Value $37,801 $55,824 6.8%
Revenues (Millions) $24,028 $74,382 21.0%
Operating Earnings (Millions) $2,450 $7,677 20.8%
Cash Flow (Millions) $4,200 $9,200 17.0%

Cash flow defined as reported earnings + growth of float.

We do not know if, or at what Price, Warren Buffett will start a buyback program. Still, if he were to do so at a relative value close to the Price he struck in 2000, in my opinion, it would not be too far below today’s market price, and the Warren Buffett premium will have to disappear. The growth rates shown in Table Two would lead you to believe that Berkshire Hathaway’s growth in intrinsic value is a lot closer to the 12% line than it is to the 6.8% line.

What Warren Buffett Premium?

We have heard about this Warren Buffett premium for so long, and the universal assumption has always been that there will be stock decline when he leaves. I want to suggest, just for the sake of being argumentative, the possibility of a Warren Buffett discount and propose a scenario where the stock price will increase in his absence. It seems likely the stock is very close to the value level it reached in March of 2000. Warren Buffett may be reluctant to initiate a stock buyback for any number of reasons.

He may well believe that he will have a better use for the money in the not-too-distant future, or he may just not want to pump the stock at this particular time. Absent Warren Buffett premium, though, and we have a different set of circumstances. Take $10,000 off the Class A stock today, and I think the buyback is pretty compelling. Further, without Warren Buffett, the buyback threshold is likely to rise substantially merely because what does the new guy do with all that cash? Without Warren Buffett, the case for returning money to shareholders is much more compelling.

06/01/2005



Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Comment


Name

Email

Url


Blog Archive

2020

  • The Stock Market

2019

  • Behavioral Investing

2018

  • Trumped
  • Warren Buffett vs Wall Street
  • Globalism, 1982-2000 Bull Market

2017

  • Volatility Underlying Calm Market
  • What’s new with CB&I?
  • Passive Investing
  • Economic Cycles
  • Current Stock Market 2017 Comment

2016

  • Global Plastics Summit Highlights
  • Value Investing vs Index Investing
  • How to Play an Index Bubble
  • Successful Investors
  • Is the Market Overvalued?
  • Operating Earnings
  • Article by investment manager in Bay Hill Living
  • Building Foundation

2015

  • 3G Culture – Dream Big
  • Myopic Loss Aversion
  • CBI Nuclear Energy
  • St Joe Company
  • What’s in a Word? Plastics.
  • Are Bonds Safer Than Stocks?

2014

  • Chicago Bridge and Iron
  • CAMEX 2014
  • Global Economy October 2014
  • Fluor Corporation
  • Interesting Quotes from Daily Journal Annual Meeting
  • The Daily Journal Annual Meeting
  • Albemarle Corporation
  • Triumph Group
  • The American Energy Revolution
  • Singapore

2013

  • St Joe Company Update
  • Hedge Fund Managers
  • Triumph Group Inc.
  • Bitter Brew
  • An Antifragile Portfolio

2012

  • Leucadia National Corporation
  • This Time it is Different
  • Successful traders psychology
  • St Joe Company
  • Learning from Pain

2011

  • Long Cycles – Part II
  • Long Cycle
  • Nasty Month for Market
  • Make a Buck with Fortescue Metals Group
  • Berkshire Hathaway Look Through Earnings
  • St Joe Company Inc
  • Successful Investment Management
  • A Look Into Latin American Market
  • The Mother of all Quarters
  • 2010 Investment year results

2010

  • Fault Lines
  • US Market 2010
  • Berkshire Hathaway Third Quarter 2010
  • The Stock Market 2010
  • Berkshire Hathaway Second Quarter 2010
  • Berkshire Hathaway Performance
  • Long Term Greedy
  • Goldman Sachs
  • Berkadia and Leucadia
  • USG corporation
  • Berkshire Hathaway 2009 2010
  • Why Capitalism Works

2009

  • The Lords of Finance
  • The $44 Billion Dollar Train Set
  • Berkshire Hathaway 3rd Quarter 2009
  • Career Risk for Investment Manager
  • Berkshire Hathaway financial statements
  • Berkshire Hathaway Preferred Stock
  • Moral Hazard
  • Credit Default Swap
  • The Shadow Banking System
  • Learning Things the Hard Way
  • Our C-System
  • 2008 Investment results

2008

  • Investment Risk
  • Bear Markets
  • Generational Events
  • Orange sheets – Money is doing better
  • Inflation Not The Problem
  • Tipping Point
  • Long Term Capital Management
  • Financial Insurance
  • Western Refining Inc
  • Berkshire Hathaway Year To Date
  • Berkshire Hathaway Cash Flow
  • 2007 investment results

2007

  • Investment results 4th Quarter 2007
  • Greenspan on Inflation
  • Berkshire Hathaway Third Quarter 2007
  • Berkshire Hathaway Operating income 2007
  • Berkshire Hathaway Hedge Fund
  • Leveraged Buyouts
  • Stability Unstable
  • Weak Dollar
  • Berkshire Hathaway Chairman’s Letter
  • Steel Dynamics
  • Breakwater Resources
  • 2006 Investment year results

2006

  • New Investment Stocks
  • Equitas
  • Berkshire Hathaway Third Quarter 2006
  • Hurricane Synergy
  • Berkshire Hathaway Second Quarter 2006
  • Fat Pitch
  • Perfectly Obvious
  • Berkshire Hathaway Growth Rate
  • Berkshire Hathaway First Quarter 2006
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report 2006
  • Inflation Is
  • 2005 Investment year results

2005

  • Exogenous Events
  • The Easy Money
  • Look-Through Earnings
  • High-Risk Mortgages
  • Unintended Consequences
  • Rydex Ursa Fund
  • Warren Buffett Premium
  • Private Equity
  • Latticework Mental Models
  • Buffett’s Lackluster Performance
  • 2004 Investment year results
  • Professor Smith’s Second Bubble

2004

  • Hedging Currency Disaster
  • Risk Assessment
  • Too Many Bears
  • The Chinese Century?
  • Patterned Irrationality
  • Timber
  • Costco’s Cash
  • Physics Envy by Charlie Munger
  • Asset Allocation Berkshire Hathaway
  • The Balance of Payments
  • 2003 Investment year results

2003

  • Hedge Funds
  • The trade deficit is not debt
  • Secular Bear Market
  • Which Index Funds?
  • A Different Drummer
  • Costco’s Float
  • The Power of Float
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting 2003
  • Psychology of Human Misjudgment
  • Sitting on the Sidelines
  • Berkshire Hathaway intrinsic value
  • 2002 Investment year results

2002

  • Insurance company Moats
  • Bond Bubble
  • Berkshire Hathaway Cash Flow 2002
  • Behavioral Economics
  • The Bear Market 2002
  • Greenspan Put
  • Second Quarter Cash Flow at Berkshire Hathaway
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting 2002
  • Red Wire – Green Wire
  • Stupid FED Tricks
  • The Bottom Line
  • 2001 Investment year results

2001

  • Don’t Fight the FED
  • Buy and Hold? – It all Depends
  • Ben Laden and Berkshire Hathaway
  • The Dinosaurs Dance
  • Costco Moat
  • Bubble Watching
  • Sit on your Ass investing
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting 2001
  • Carnival Cruise Lines
  • 450000 Square Ft Furniture Store
  • Lunch Money Indicators – Annual report
  • Other People’s Money

2000

  • Bear Tracks
  • Build It and Money Will Come
  • Efficient Stock Market
  • Style Drift
  • Lunch Money Indicators – Options
  • Identifying Problems
  • Small Retail Stocks
  • Charlie Munger comments
  • Big Al and the Bubble Machine
  • Berkshire Hathaway Cheap
  • Index Funds
  • 16 rules for investment success
Make an appointment or contact us by phone: +1 (689) 246 49 49
© 1999 - 2022 Losch Management Company
Support by Global AGM