• Home
  • About
  • Team
  • Contacts
  • Blog

2002 Investment year results

  1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. 2002 Investment year ...

Portfolio manager’s Letter January 2003

2002 investment year results – was a pretty good year

On this basis 2002 was a pretty good year. 2002 investment year results: Losch Management Company’s average account was down by $4.7% while the S&P 500 was down 23.4% and the Wilshire total market average was down 22.1%.

The Dow Jones industrial average was only down 16.8%, but this average only measures the performance of 30 stocks versus 500 in the S&P 500 and over 6000 in the Wilshire. Of all the averages I prefer the Wilshire when measuring relative performance because it has the broadest base.

Table One – Fifteen Year Performance

Year Losch Management S&P 500 Index NASDAQ Index
Period Cumulative Period Cumulative Period Cumulative
1988 17.07% 17.07% 12.40% 12.40% 15.40% 15.40%
1989 48.06% 73.33% 27.25% 43.03% 19.24% 37.60%
1990 -0.05% 73.25% -6.56% 33.65% -17.81% 13.10%
1991 20.99% 109.61% 26.31% 68.81% 56.86% 77.40%
1992 49.72% 213.83% 4.46% 76.34% 15.45% 104.81%
1993 5.40% 230.78% 7.06% 88.79% 14.73% 134.98%
1994 14.73% 279.50% -1.54% 85.88% -3.20% 127.46%
1995 47.90% 461.28% 34.11% 149.28% 39.92% 218.26%
1996 6.66% 498.66% 20.26% 199.79% 22.71% 290.54%
1997 43.40% 758.48% 31.01% 292.75% 21.64% 375.05%
1998 25.94% 981.17% 26.67% 397.50% 39.92% 564.69%
1999 -2.89% 949.93% 19.53% 494.66% 85.59% 1133.60%
2000 16.40% 1122.12% -10.14% 434.36% -39.29% 648.92%
2001 16.89% 1328.53% -13.04% 364.68% -21.05% 491.27%
2002 -4.72% 1261.11% -23.37% 256.09% -31.53% 304.84%
Annualized 18.84%   8.84%   9.76%

Table One compares Losch Management Company’s performance to the S&P 500 Index and the NASDAQ Index. The cumulative column shows total gain for entire period. For instance $100,000 invested in an index fund tied to performance of the S&P 500 would have grown to $356,000. $100,000 Invested in a fund that tracked the NASDAQ would have grown to $405,000. While our record would have grown the $100,000 to $1,361,000.

Table Two – Ten Year Performance

Year Losch Management S&P 500 Index NASDAQ Index
Period Cumulative Period Cumulative Period Cumulative
1993 5.40% 5.40% 7.06% 7.06% 8.58% 8.58%
1994 14.73% 20.93% -1.54% 5.41% -2.52% 5.84%
1995 47.90% 78.85% 34.11% 41.37% 33.40% 41.20%
1996 6.66% 90.76% 20.26% 70.01% 18.84% 67.80%
1997 43.40% 173.55% 31.01% 122.73% 29.17% 116.74%
1998 25.94% 244.51% 26.67% 182.13% 21.72% 163.82%
1999 -2.89% 234.55% 19.53% 237.23% 22.05% 221.99%
2000 16.40% 289.42% -10.14% 203.03% -11.85% 183.84%
2001 16.89% 355.19% -13.04% 163.52% -12.06% 149.61%
2002 -4.72% 333.71% -23.37% 101.93% -22.08% 94.49%
Annualized 16.27%   7.28%   6.88%

Table Two covers Ten year performance, and shows that a $100,000 theoretically invested in the S&P 500 would have grown to $201,900. The same $100,00 in a fund that exactly tracked the NASDAQ Index would have increased to $194,500. While at Losch Management Company’s average account grew $100,000 to $433,700.

Table Three — Five year Performance

Year Losch Management S&P 500 Index NASDAQ Index
Period Cumulative Period Cumulative Period Cumulative
1998 25.94% 25.94% 26.67% 26.67% 21.72% 21.72%
1999 -2.89% 22.30% 19.53% 51.41% 22.05% 48.56%
2000 16.40% 43.36% -10.14% 36.06% -11.85% 30.95%
2001 16.89% 66.40% -13.04% 18.31% -12.06% 15.16%
2002 -4.72% 58.55% -23.37% -9.34% -22.08% -10.27%
Annualized 9.65%   -1.94%   6.88%

For the Five years ended December 31, (Table Three) $100,000 invested in an S&P 500 index fund would have decreased in value, to $92,700.

Table Four — Bear Market March 2000 to December 2002

  Losch Management S&P 500 Index NASDAQ Index
Period Cumulative Period Cumulative Period Cumulative
Mar-00-Dec-00 32.09% 32.09% -3.38% -3.38% -46.72% -46.72%
Jan-01-Dec-01 16.89% 54.40% -13.04% -15.98% -21.05% -54.94%
Jan-02-Dec-02 -4.72% 47.11% -23.37% -35.61% -31.53% -71.20%

Table Four is the one I like best. It shows that Losch Management Company’s out performed the S&P 500 buy a cumulative 82.7 percent since the bear market emerged in March of 2000. Divide by 2.75 years for the time covered by this chart, and the annual rate of out performance is approximately 30% per year.

If you had put $100,000 in an S&P 500 index fund in March 2000 it would have been worth $64,000 on December 31, 2002. That is considerably better than NASDAQ. A fund tracked that average would have been worth $100,000 in a fund that tracked the Wilshire index would have decreased to $89,700.

At the same time this $100,000 account would have increased to an average of $158.500 at Losch Management Company.

The key to achieving a satisfactory long term result is relative performance and particularly relative performance in bad markets. Yes Bull markets are when you make money $28,800 on December 31. During the this period our average account would have appreciated to $147,100.

Fearless Forecasts for 2003

At my age you would think that I would know better that to try to predict economic trends, but bad habits are hard to shake:

1. Interest Rates

But Bear markets are more important measure of how well your money is being managed. Granted this is an argument that makes us look pretty good, so is obviously self severing, but then who are we to argue with Warren Buffett?

The FED may not have to raise interest rates in 2003, but sooner or later, inflation will reappear. And rates will move higher.

2. Corporate Earnings

A tough pricing environment will create a headwind for profits in all regions, but even a mild earnings recovery will allow equity prices to move higher, given buoyant liquidity conditions.

3. Stock prices

The short term picture for stocks has improved, but valuations and investor disillusionment make a major bull market unlikely.

History suggests that burst asset bubbles are followed by a broad trading range that can last for many years. This is an environment were buy and hold is not necessarily the best investment philosophy. Fortunately traditional value investing does work.

Value investing involves buying stocks that are selling significantly below intrinsic value and selling them when they approach full value. This approach works well in the current market because it constantly lowers portfolio risk.

This Value investing should not be confused with market timing, even though they sometimes looks the same. Because this approach means buying only at a discount to intrinsic value, purchases tend to occur at market bottoms and sales come after there has been a period of recovery. The distinction, and it is an important one, is that you are buying individual stocks and not the market.

You try to ignore the market and focus on the price of individual companies that meet your criteria. Purchases and sales should be based on the Value of the company not what you think the market is going to do in the next six months.

4. Foreign Stocks

European and emerging market equities should outperform Wall Street. The Asian markets look the best bet. Japanese stocks are primed for a bounce. Russian oil and gas stocks look very cheap when compared to their international competition.

5. Bonds

The low in bond yields has probably been seen, barring a major economic or financial shock, Interest rates have been declining since the early nineteen eighties, but it hard to see how they can go much lower.

As if the Picture for bonds was not already bad enough President Bush has introduced at proposal to eliminate the double taxation of dividends. This could have a negative effect on bonds in general, and municipal and treasury securities in particular.

6. Currency

The dollar seems to be headed lower on a multi-year view, but it will probably be gradual process given the weak condition of overseas economies. Any dollar weakness will be mainly against the euro and commodity currencies rather than the yen.

7. Commodities

The grinding bull market in commodities should continue, helped by strong demand from Asia. Oil prices could surprise on the upside, even after the Iraq situation is resolved. Longer run, a shift toward hard assets will benefit commodities, including gold, and is likely to benefit some emerging economies such as Russia that have abundant natural recourses Eventually this rise in commodity prices is likely to lead to a return of inflation, maybe, sooner that most people think. The Inflation in the seventies started with strong upward moves in commodity prices.

8. Insurance

The world is a less safe and less certain place. Businesses and investors will thus demand higher risk premiums. All of this should help to keep insurance prices high for the next couple of years at least.

Quote from Warren Buffett

The following is a quote from the December 1960 letter from Warren Buffett to the Partners of the Buffett Partnership Limited.

“My continual objective in managing partnership funds is to achieve a longterm performance record superior to that of the Industrial Average … Unless we do achieve this superior performance there is no reason for existence of the partnerships.

However, I have pointed out that any superior record which we might accomplish should not be expected to be evidenced by a relatively constant advantage in performance compared to the Average. Rather it is likely that if such an advantage is achieved, it will be through better-than-average performance in stable or declining markets and average, or perhaps even poorer-than-average performance in rising markets.

I would consider a year in which we declined 15% and the Average 30% to be much superior to a year when both we and the Average advanced 20%.

Over a period of time there are going to be good and bad years; there is nothing to be gained by getting enthused or depressed about the sequence in which they occur. The important thing is to be beating par; a four on a par three hole is not as good as a five on a par five hole and it is unrealistic to assume we are not going to have our share of both par three’s and par five’s …

With this background it is not unexpected that 1960 was a better than average year for us. As contrasted with an overall loss of 6.3%. for the Industrial Average, we had a 22.8% gain for the seven partnerships operating throughout the year …”

Of course Warren Buffett went on to outperform the “Average for all but one of the next 42 years, and by a margin that was closer to fifteen percent that to ten percent. One the keys to this success is this aversion to risk. His approach starts with method of stock selection that avoids popular and exciting stocks. Because these stocks carry very high prices in bull markets, and because of these high prices, the highest risk in a market correction.

This quote is appropriate now because now because it is important to remember that performance is relative, and that under-performance is much more dangerous over performance much nicer in a bear market.

For Warren Buffett rule number one is “never lose money.” Rule number two is “never forget rule number one” It is quite likely that his ability to out-perform the market is based on the philosophy expressed in this quote. If you can successfully avoid the big bath it is much easier to beat the market in the long run.

01/01/2003



Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Comment


Name

Email

Url


Blog Archive

2020

  • The Stock Market

2019

  • Behavioral Investing

2018

  • Trumped
  • Warren Buffett vs Wall Street
  • Globalism, 1982-2000 Bull Market

2017

  • Volatility Underlying Calm Market
  • What’s new with CB&I?
  • Passive Investing
  • Economic Cycles
  • Current Stock Market 2017 Comment

2016

  • Global Plastics Summit Highlights
  • Value Investing vs Index Investing
  • How to Play an Index Bubble
  • Successful Investors
  • Is the Market Overvalued?
  • Operating Earnings
  • Article by investment manager in Bay Hill Living
  • Building Foundation

2015

  • 3G Culture – Dream Big
  • Myopic Loss Aversion
  • CBI Nuclear Energy
  • St Joe Company
  • What’s in a Word? Plastics.
  • Are Bonds Safer Than Stocks?

2014

  • Chicago Bridge and Iron
  • CAMEX 2014
  • Global Economy October 2014
  • Fluor Corporation
  • Interesting Quotes from Daily Journal Annual Meeting
  • The Daily Journal Annual Meeting
  • Albemarle Corporation
  • Triumph Group
  • The American Energy Revolution
  • Singapore

2013

  • St Joe Company Update
  • Hedge Fund Managers
  • Triumph Group Inc.
  • Bitter Brew
  • An Antifragile Portfolio

2012

  • Leucadia National Corporation
  • This Time it is Different
  • Successful traders psychology
  • St Joe Company
  • Learning from Pain

2011

  • Long Cycles – Part II
  • Long Cycle
  • Nasty Month for Market
  • Make a Buck with Fortescue Metals Group
  • Berkshire Hathaway Look Through Earnings
  • St Joe Company Inc
  • Successful Investment Management
  • A Look Into Latin American Market
  • The Mother of all Quarters
  • 2010 Investment year results

2010

  • Fault Lines
  • US Market 2010
  • Berkshire Hathaway Third Quarter 2010
  • The Stock Market 2010
  • Berkshire Hathaway Second Quarter 2010
  • Berkshire Hathaway Performance
  • Long Term Greedy
  • Goldman Sachs
  • Berkadia and Leucadia
  • USG corporation
  • Berkshire Hathaway 2009 2010
  • Why Capitalism Works

2009

  • The Lords of Finance
  • The $44 Billion Dollar Train Set
  • Berkshire Hathaway 3rd Quarter 2009
  • Career Risk for Investment Manager
  • Berkshire Hathaway financial statements
  • Berkshire Hathaway Preferred Stock
  • Moral Hazard
  • Credit Default Swap
  • The Shadow Banking System
  • Learning Things the Hard Way
  • Our C-System
  • 2008 Investment results

2008

  • Investment Risk
  • Bear Markets
  • Generational Events
  • Orange sheets – Money is doing better
  • Inflation Not The Problem
  • Tipping Point
  • Long Term Capital Management
  • Financial Insurance
  • Western Refining Inc
  • Berkshire Hathaway Year To Date
  • Berkshire Hathaway Cash Flow
  • 2007 investment results

2007

  • Investment results 4th Quarter 2007
  • Greenspan on Inflation
  • Berkshire Hathaway Third Quarter 2007
  • Berkshire Hathaway Operating income 2007
  • Berkshire Hathaway Hedge Fund
  • Leveraged Buyouts
  • Stability Unstable
  • Weak Dollar
  • Berkshire Hathaway Chairman’s Letter
  • Steel Dynamics
  • Breakwater Resources
  • 2006 Investment year results

2006

  • New Investment Stocks
  • Equitas
  • Berkshire Hathaway Third Quarter 2006
  • Hurricane Synergy
  • Berkshire Hathaway Second Quarter 2006
  • Fat Pitch
  • Perfectly Obvious
  • Berkshire Hathaway Growth Rate
  • Berkshire Hathaway First Quarter 2006
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report 2006
  • Inflation Is
  • 2005 Investment year results

2005

  • Exogenous Events
  • The Easy Money
  • Look-Through Earnings
  • High-Risk Mortgages
  • Unintended Consequences
  • Rydex Ursa Fund
  • Warren Buffett Premium
  • Private Equity
  • Latticework Mental Models
  • Buffett’s Lackluster Performance
  • 2004 Investment year results
  • Professor Smith’s Second Bubble

2004

  • Hedging Currency Disaster
  • Risk Assessment
  • Too Many Bears
  • The Chinese Century?
  • Patterned Irrationality
  • Timber
  • Costco’s Cash
  • Physics Envy by Charlie Munger
  • Asset Allocation Berkshire Hathaway
  • The Balance of Payments
  • 2003 Investment year results

2003

  • Hedge Funds
  • The trade deficit is not debt
  • Secular Bear Market
  • Which Index Funds?
  • A Different Drummer
  • Costco’s Float
  • The Power of Float
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting 2003
  • Psychology of Human Misjudgment
  • Sitting on the Sidelines
  • Berkshire Hathaway intrinsic value
  • 2002 Investment year results

2002

  • Insurance company Moats
  • Bond Bubble
  • Berkshire Hathaway Cash Flow 2002
  • Behavioral Economics
  • The Bear Market 2002
  • Greenspan Put
  • Second Quarter Cash Flow at Berkshire Hathaway
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting 2002
  • Red Wire – Green Wire
  • Stupid FED Tricks
  • The Bottom Line
  • 2001 Investment year results

2001

  • Don’t Fight the FED
  • Buy and Hold? – It all Depends
  • Ben Laden and Berkshire Hathaway
  • The Dinosaurs Dance
  • Costco Moat
  • Bubble Watching
  • Sit on your Ass investing
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting 2001
  • Carnival Cruise Lines
  • 450000 Square Ft Furniture Store
  • Lunch Money Indicators – Annual report
  • Other People’s Money

2000

  • Bear Tracks
  • Build It and Money Will Come
  • Efficient Stock Market
  • Style Drift
  • Lunch Money Indicators – Options
  • Identifying Problems
  • Small Retail Stocks
  • Charlie Munger comments
  • Big Al and the Bubble Machine
  • Berkshire Hathaway Cheap
  • Index Funds
  • 16 rules for investment success
Make an appointment or contact us by phone: +1 (689) 246 49 49
© 1999 - 2022 Losch Management Company
Support by Global AGM