• Home
  • About
  • Team
  • Contacts
  • Blog

Steel Dynamics

  1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. Steel Dynamics

Portfolio manager’s Letter February 2007

Steel Dynamics

Steel Dynamics

Steel Dynamics reported their fourth quarter and annual earnings on January 23. Income for 2006 was $397 million or $3.77 a share, so at $38 dollars a share the company is selling at 10 times 2006 earnings. This compares to net income of $220 million or $2.17 a share in 2005. In the six years since 2000 the Steel Dynamics has increased its earnings from $54 million to today’s $397 million which is a somewhat startling rate of increase (for a steel company) in earnings of 39% per year. SDI appears to be a company with a high tech growth rate and a blue collar, rust belt valuation.

Steel Dynamics is an eleven year old company that claims to have the most modern steel operation in the United States. Until last year’s acquisition of West Virginia Steel (part of Roanoke Electric) was completely non-union. Beginning with production of flat roll steel in Butler Indiana in 1996 the Steel Dynamics added a fabricating operation at the same site in 2000, a structural and rail division in Columbia City Indiana in 2003, a bar products division in Pittsboro in 2004, and another fabricating plant in Lake City, Florida in 2005.

On April 11, 2006 the Steel Dynamics company completed its purchase of Roanoke Electric. Under the terms of the merger Roanoke shareholders received $110 million in cash and 4.5 million shares of Steel Dynamics stock with a value of $127 million. The cash portion of the purchase price was paid from the companies cash on hand, and potential dilution from the Stock portion of the price was more than eliminated by SDI’s stock repurchase program, which repurchased $246 million worth of the company stock during 2006. The company purchased Roanoke Electric Inc to diversify its product offering, provide additional penetration of the joist, truss; and girder markets, and to broaden its geographical presence. Roanoke Electric has manufacturing facilities in Roanoke Virginia and Huntington West Virginia.

Fourth Quarter Conference Call

This years earnings of $397 million was an increase of 79% from 2005. During the fourth quarter conference call management indicated that shipments for the first quarter of 2007 would likely be up 15% to 20% over 2006, and that orders for flat rolled steel which had been weak last year because of problems in the automotive and construction industries, had recovered to the extent that the Steel Dynamics’s flat rolled capacity was fully booked through the end of February and that it was looking to increase prices in March.

During the call, management said that Steel Dynamics plans on about $400 million in capital expansion projects for 2007. To the skeptic this might sound like a massive capacity expansion at the top of the business cycle, but they also indicated that expenditures in 2008 would be more in the area of $120 million to $150 million; and that the company would pay out a substantial portion of its future free cash flow to shareholders in the form of increased dividends or further stock buy-backs, and their record on this has been pretty good in the past.

The expansion planned for 2007 should increase the Steel Dynamics’s capacity to nearly 5.2 million tons for 2007, and 6.5 million tons by the end of 2008, an eventual increase of 38% from 4.7 million tons produced in 2006. About $200 million of this year’s capital spending will go to increase capacity and the Steel Dynamics’s structural steel plant in Columbia, Indiana. Approximately $35 million will go to expansion of the West Virginia Steel facility in Huntington West Virginia. The Steel Dynamics’s goal for all expansion or investment projects is a 20% return on the capital invested which with reasonable leverage will yield a substantially better return on shareholder equity.

In their merger with Roanoke Electric last year, they acquired West Virginia Steel, which is a small mill were employee’s have a contract with the United Steel workers. On the conference call management said they have a good relationship with the union. But indicated that it was unlikely they would acquire anymore union shops. Indeed it is difficult to see why employees would have a desire to join a union. In 2004 the average compensation for non-executive employees was $84,200 plus profit sharing, which averaged $18,200.

Yet in spite of, or perhaps because of, this high wage, the company remains one of the most productive steel companies in the United States with an operating margins that are about 15% higher than the average domestic steel producer.

Table compares Steel Dynamics to four other steel companies. It shows that SDI is smaller and faster growing than the others, and while its operating margin is slightly less than POSCO (the large Korean company that is currently the most profitable steel company in the world) it is a good deal higher than the other two American companies.

  Nucor Steel US Steel Steel Dynamics POSCO
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.19 0.23 0.36 0.16
Market Capitalization (billions) $19.2 $10.1 $3.5 $28.2
Revenue (billions) $14.7 $15.7 $3.20 $28.1
Operating Income $2.7 $1.7 $640 $6.0
Operating Margin 12.2% 10.8% 20.0% 21.4%
Earnings Per Share $5.68 $11.18 $3.77 $13.5
P/E ratio 11.36 6.9 10.3 6.80
Five Year Growth of Revenue 27.8% 19.8% 39.7% 13.81%

Note on Monthly Performance Figures

Your monthly investment portfolio performance summary (the green pages) contains a section for each period that shows the performance of market indexes for you to use as benchmarks for the performance of your investment portfolio. For these reports data for the Wilshire and the S&P 500 indexes are copied from the published prices for those indexes on the last day of the period covered by the report.

These are the only figures that are available on a monthly basis. Therefore the data does not include the value of the dividends paid by the companies included in the indexes. For this reason the figures shown on the green sheets understate the actual returns of an Index funds based on these indexes by the amount of the dividends paid by the companies in the index.

02/01/2007



Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Comment


Name

Email

Url


Blog Archive

2020

  • The Stock Market

2019

  • Behavioral Investing

2018

  • Trumped
  • Warren Buffett vs Wall Street
  • Globalism, 1982-2000 Bull Market

2017

  • Volatility Underlying Calm Market
  • What’s new with CB&I?
  • Passive Investing
  • Economic Cycles
  • Current Stock Market 2017 Comment

2016

  • Global Plastics Summit Highlights
  • Value Investing vs Index Investing
  • How to Play an Index Bubble
  • Successful Investors
  • Is the Market Overvalued?
  • Operating Earnings
  • Article by investment manager in Bay Hill Living
  • Building Foundation

2015

  • 3G Culture – Dream Big
  • Myopic Loss Aversion
  • CBI Nuclear Energy
  • St Joe Company
  • What’s in a Word? Plastics.
  • Are Bonds Safer Than Stocks?

2014

  • Chicago Bridge and Iron
  • CAMEX 2014
  • Global Economy October 2014
  • Fluor Corporation
  • Interesting Quotes from Daily Journal Annual Meeting
  • The Daily Journal Annual Meeting
  • Albemarle Corporation
  • Triumph Group
  • The American Energy Revolution
  • Singapore

2013

  • St Joe Company Update
  • Hedge Fund Managers
  • Triumph Group Inc.
  • Bitter Brew
  • An Antifragile Portfolio

2012

  • Leucadia National Corporation
  • This Time it is Different
  • Successful traders psychology
  • St Joe Company
  • Learning from Pain

2011

  • Long Cycles – Part II
  • Long Cycle
  • Nasty Month for Market
  • Make a Buck with Fortescue Metals Group
  • Berkshire Hathaway Look Through Earnings
  • St Joe Company Inc
  • Successful Investment Management
  • A Look Into Latin American Market
  • The Mother of all Quarters
  • 2010 Investment year results

2010

  • Fault Lines
  • US Market 2010
  • Berkshire Hathaway Third Quarter 2010
  • The Stock Market 2010
  • Berkshire Hathaway Second Quarter 2010
  • Berkshire Hathaway Performance
  • Long Term Greedy
  • Goldman Sachs
  • Berkadia and Leucadia
  • USG corporation
  • Berkshire Hathaway 2009 2010
  • Why Capitalism Works

2009

  • The Lords of Finance
  • The $44 Billion Dollar Train Set
  • Berkshire Hathaway 3rd Quarter 2009
  • Career Risk for Investment Manager
  • Berkshire Hathaway financial statements
  • Berkshire Hathaway Preferred Stock
  • Moral Hazard
  • Credit Default Swap
  • The Shadow Banking System
  • Learning Things the Hard Way
  • Our C-System
  • 2008 Investment results

2008

  • Investment Risk
  • Bear Markets
  • Generational Events
  • Orange sheets – Money is doing better
  • Inflation Not The Problem
  • Tipping Point
  • Long Term Capital Management
  • Financial Insurance
  • Western Refining Inc
  • Berkshire Hathaway Year To Date
  • Berkshire Hathaway Cash Flow
  • 2007 investment results

2007

  • Investment results 4th Quarter 2007
  • Greenspan on Inflation
  • Berkshire Hathaway Third Quarter 2007
  • Berkshire Hathaway Operating income 2007
  • Berkshire Hathaway Hedge Fund
  • Leveraged Buyouts
  • Stability Unstable
  • Weak Dollar
  • Berkshire Hathaway Chairman’s Letter
  • Steel Dynamics
  • Breakwater Resources
  • 2006 Investment year results

2006

  • New Investment Stocks
  • Equitas
  • Berkshire Hathaway Third Quarter 2006
  • Hurricane Synergy
  • Berkshire Hathaway Second Quarter 2006
  • Fat Pitch
  • Perfectly Obvious
  • Berkshire Hathaway Growth Rate
  • Berkshire Hathaway First Quarter 2006
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report 2006
  • Inflation Is
  • 2005 Investment year results

2005

  • Exogenous Events
  • The Easy Money
  • Look-Through Earnings
  • High-Risk Mortgages
  • Unintended Consequences
  • Rydex Ursa Fund
  • Warren Buffett Premium
  • Private Equity
  • Latticework Mental Models
  • Buffett’s Lackluster Performance
  • 2004 Investment year results
  • Professor Smith’s Second Bubble

2004

  • Hedging Currency Disaster
  • Risk Assessment
  • Too Many Bears
  • The Chinese Century?
  • Patterned Irrationality
  • Timber
  • Costco’s Cash
  • Physics Envy by Charlie Munger
  • Asset Allocation Berkshire Hathaway
  • The Balance of Payments
  • 2003 Investment year results

2003

  • Hedge Funds
  • The trade deficit is not debt
  • Secular Bear Market
  • Which Index Funds?
  • A Different Drummer
  • Costco’s Float
  • The Power of Float
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting 2003
  • Psychology of Human Misjudgment
  • Sitting on the Sidelines
  • Berkshire Hathaway intrinsic value
  • 2002 Investment year results

2002

  • Insurance company Moats
  • Bond Bubble
  • Berkshire Hathaway Cash Flow 2002
  • Behavioral Economics
  • The Bear Market 2002
  • Greenspan Put
  • Second Quarter Cash Flow at Berkshire Hathaway
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting 2002
  • Red Wire – Green Wire
  • Stupid FED Tricks
  • The Bottom Line
  • 2001 Investment year results

2001

  • Don’t Fight the FED
  • Buy and Hold? – It all Depends
  • Ben Laden and Berkshire Hathaway
  • The Dinosaurs Dance
  • Costco Moat
  • Bubble Watching
  • Sit on your Ass investing
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting 2001
  • Carnival Cruise Lines
  • 450000 Square Ft Furniture Store
  • Lunch Money Indicators – Annual report
  • Other People’s Money

2000

  • Bear Tracks
  • Build It and Money Will Come
  • Efficient Stock Market
  • Style Drift
  • Lunch Money Indicators – Options
  • Identifying Problems
  • Small Retail Stocks
  • Charlie Munger comments
  • Big Al and the Bubble Machine
  • Berkshire Hathaway Cheap
  • Index Funds
  • 16 rules for investment success
Make an appointment or contact us by phone: +1 (689) 246 49 49
© 1999 - 2022 Losch Management Company
Support by Global AGM