• Home
  • About
  • Team
  • Contacts
  • Blog

Globalism, 1982-2000 Bull Market

  1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. Globalism, 1982-2000 ...

Globalism

Of all the things going on today. The one thing that promises to have the Greatest impact on the stock market for the next ten to twenty years is globalism. There will be bear markets, there will be bull markets, but nothing is going to have more long-term impact on the corporate bottom line and the welfare of the world population. This is not new; the chart below gives a nice picture of the first major wave of globalism from 1982-2000.

Wave globalism 1982-2000

The white lines identify three separate long bull markets within that period with the gains during those periods detailed in the table below. The first two periods could be considered one long bull with two stages, that encompass the first major wave of globalism.

Stage one of this globalism representing a recovery from the seven-teen year bear market that lasted from 1965 to 1982. With the first period lasting 12 years from 1982 to 1994. This bull market registered an average annual gain of 14.79%. After a sort correction in 1994 the bull market returned and accelerated for the next five years. In this second period the growth accelerated to a 27% average annual rate and was driven by a long period of double digit earnings growth, sparked by the first great wave of globalism and in part by the long bull finally generating a bubble that broke in March 2000.

The entire period from 1982 to 2000 was essentially one long bull market with a few short corrections such 1987 and a fairly painless recession in 1991. It does demonstrate that bull markets can last a long time. This one lasted for 18 years and saw the S&P index appreciate from 101 to 1552.

1982-2000 bull market SP-500

A similar result is highly unlikely now, for several reasons such as; widespread overvaluation in the US equity markets, economy growing rapidly, and with US unemployment approaching near record lows, make unlikely the FED will be able to go for anywhere near nine more years without having to pull the punch bowl.

For the current bull market to eventually achieve the longevity of 1982 to 2000 globalism bull market, it will likely require some sort of intervening bear market. The most likely form of that correction would be a short recession brought by Fed Tightening.

The FED has been raising interest rates by 3/4 of one percent per year. At that speed it might take four or five years for interest rates to reach the level required to generate a recession, but if inflation accelerates (which we consider likely), the Fed will have be more aggressive, and the length of our current bull run will shorten accordingly (to maybe to 2020 or 2021).

History does not repeat but sometimes it rhymes. Since we cannot predict the future, perhaps it will be instructive to study the 1982-2002 Bull and see if it is possible that any of its economic factors and business patterns will repeat. What could there be about today’s market that might relate to similar conditions in the 1980’s and 1990’s?

1982 to 2000 Bull Market

Both 1982 to 2000 bull and our present bull market began with a market recovery from a long, deep bear market. They began with a strong upward thrust from a bounce from an over-sold market. With the 1982 bull this lead to long period of double digit earnings growth that accelerated in its last five years.

The fundamental factors that fed this growth in corporate earnings were globalism and technological innovation that fed this globalism. It is the ability of these factors to repeat that have the most to tell us about the future. Today, it seems the progress in technology, is if anything, accelerating. So clearly the key to understand economic grown in our country and the rest of world is the strength of the continuing trend to globalism.

The growth in global trade in the eighties and nineties was able to lift 1.5 billion people out of poverty globally. This statistic is a strong testimony to the ability of free markets to improve the quality of life around the world and the importance of globalism. Interestingly, a large portion the people brought out of poverty occurred in China, a country with a very, authoritarian government, that had chosen for pragmatic reasons (the failure of its socialist economic system to improve the lifestyle of the people living in China) to open the Country’s markets to the outside world.

China has lifted hundreds of millions of people who twenty years ago were earning a few hundred dollars a year working in rice paddies into middle class factory workers. China’s leaders did this by embracing a western style free market economy promote rapid economic growth. They committed to free markets for the very pragmatic reason that they believed that to remain in power they would have to produce a strong and growing economy. Their biggest fear is that a decline in the Chinese economy would create political unrest within their 1.3 billion citizens and the possibility of Political chaos.

Make no mistake, that while Current Chinese leadership may embrace free markets, they remain committed to authoritarian political system.

Global Middle-Class Growth

A recent study by the Brookings Institution estimates the current wave of globalism will bring another 2.5 billion people in Asia into the middle class by 2030. This study projected that by 2030 middle class consumer spending in china will be about three times middle class spending in the US, and India by about twice as much. While this is just a forecast, and subject to the traditional problems of forecasting the growth trends. China and India are well established with China’s growth in GDP for this year at 6.6% and India’s at 7.2 % China in particular has generated considerable momentum.

Middle-Class spending chartIf we accept the Brookings study as a reasonable estimate of the effects of globalism, where we will be by 2030, then the story will be one of profound change and creative disruption.

For American businesses with a robust international presence, the opportunities from globalism will be significant. A lot more customers if you have the right product. China’s growth will offer competition in most of the International markets were here is an American presence today. This and the growth in Southeast Asia has the potential to generate strong double-digit earnings growth similar to, or greater than the earnings expansion from 1994 to 2000. To take advantage of this opportunity is not going to be easy, and for any company that focuses on domestic American market will miss the much larger international opportunity.

For much of the past century, the United States has led the world in globalism. Any business seeking World Scale had to enter and compete successfully in our market. In this century the game will change rapidly and any American company seeking to maintain its world scale will have to find a way to compete in China and Southeast Asia.

With middle-class spending in this country and Europe nearly stagnant in real terms, most of spending growth will be coming from offshore. By 2030 China’s middle class will be spending Three times as much as America middle class. India will be spending twice as much.

For American business the most important problem will be in finding ways to sell their products to the rest of the world. Putting tariffs on imported products. is unlikely to help, any may eventually destroy any company that is supported by tariffs. The Brookings study projects US domestic middle class spending as percentage of global spending will drop from 13% in 2015 to 7% in 2030.

Globalism. Focus on the present

The question, of course, is will the push to globalism remain as strong as it is today? The evidence supports that view that it will. “The Economist“ Magazine publishes a weekly table that estimates the rate Gross National Product growth for all the major countries in the world. Even though this Country’s economic growth has picked up since 2016 and 2017 and in now running well ahead of most of Europe, it is paltry compared to growth in the Asian countries on the accompanying table chart compiled from “The Economist“ data.

Gross National Product growthThose Asian counties have a combined population 3.4 billion people compared 324 million in the United States. Today the United States with much higher total Personal Income than China for a few more years, America can focus on “American First” if it wants. Still, the race for Global Scale is going on someplace else as globalism continues elsewhere. Any International Company that can successfully compete in Asia will have access to many new customers, and the potential for many years of double digit profit growth, but no one said that was going to be easy.

Many large American companies have seen their prices inflated by the rush into indexing. Some of those companies will not survive, at least in their present form, as globalism continues to impact international competition. Most at risk are large-capitalization companies that do not presently have strong ties to international business.

With this strong demographic background, Corporate Earnings can repeat the rate of growth we saw from globalism from 1995 to 2000. The keys to this potential continued strong economic growth in emerging markets. Are that there will probably have adjustment in stock valuations either through sharp down market or longer period churning movement that would give earnings a chance to catch up the stock price. (Maybe that’s what is happening now). The longer this goes the longer or long-term bull will survive.

It is also important to pay close attention to inflation because in the final analysis. What the Federal Reserve does with interest rate will eventually be dictated by what happens with inflation.

03/31/2018



Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Comment


Name

Email

Url


Blog Archive

2020

  • The Stock Market

2019

  • Behavioral Investing

2018

  • Trumped
  • Warren Buffett vs Wall Street
  • Globalism, 1982-2000 Bull Market

2017

  • Volatility Underlying Calm Market
  • What’s new with CB&I?
  • Passive Investing
  • Economic Cycles
  • Current Stock Market 2017 Comment

2016

  • Global Plastics Summit Highlights
  • Value Investing vs Index Investing
  • How to Play an Index Bubble
  • Successful Investors
  • Is the Market Overvalued?
  • Operating Earnings
  • Article by investment manager in Bay Hill Living
  • Building Foundation

2015

  • 3G Culture – Dream Big
  • Myopic Loss Aversion
  • CBI Nuclear Energy
  • St Joe Company
  • What’s in a Word? Plastics.
  • Are Bonds Safer Than Stocks?

2014

  • Chicago Bridge and Iron
  • CAMEX 2014
  • Global Economy October 2014
  • Fluor Corporation
  • Interesting Quotes from Daily Journal Annual Meeting
  • The Daily Journal Annual Meeting
  • Albemarle Corporation
  • Triumph Group
  • The American Energy Revolution
  • Singapore

2013

  • St Joe Company Update
  • Hedge Fund Managers
  • Triumph Group Inc.
  • Bitter Brew
  • An Antifragile Portfolio

2012

  • Leucadia National Corporation
  • This Time it is Different
  • Successful traders psychology
  • St Joe Company
  • Learning from Pain

2011

  • Long Cycles – Part II
  • Long Cycle
  • Nasty Month for Market
  • Make a Buck with Fortescue Metals Group
  • Berkshire Hathaway Look Through Earnings
  • St Joe Company Inc
  • Successful Investment Management
  • A Look Into Latin American Market
  • The Mother of all Quarters
  • 2010 Investment year results

2010

  • Fault Lines
  • US Market 2010
  • Berkshire Hathaway Third Quarter 2010
  • The Stock Market 2010
  • Berkshire Hathaway Second Quarter 2010
  • Berkshire Hathaway Performance
  • Long Term Greedy
  • Goldman Sachs
  • Berkadia and Leucadia
  • USG corporation
  • Berkshire Hathaway 2009 2010
  • Why Capitalism Works

2009

  • The Lords of Finance
  • The $44 Billion Dollar Train Set
  • Berkshire Hathaway 3rd Quarter 2009
  • Career Risk for Investment Manager
  • Berkshire Hathaway financial statements
  • Berkshire Hathaway Preferred Stock
  • Moral Hazard
  • Credit Default Swap
  • The Shadow Banking System
  • Learning Things the Hard Way
  • Our C-System
  • 2008 Investment results

2008

  • Investment Risk
  • Bear Markets
  • Generational Events
  • Orange sheets – Money is doing better
  • Inflation Not The Problem
  • Tipping Point
  • Long Term Capital Management
  • Financial Insurance
  • Western Refining Inc
  • Berkshire Hathaway Year To Date
  • Berkshire Hathaway Cash Flow
  • 2007 investment results

2007

  • Investment results 4th Quarter 2007
  • Greenspan on Inflation
  • Berkshire Hathaway Third Quarter 2007
  • Berkshire Hathaway Operating income 2007
  • Berkshire Hathaway Hedge Fund
  • Leveraged Buyouts
  • Stability Unstable
  • Weak Dollar
  • Berkshire Hathaway Chairman’s Letter
  • Steel Dynamics
  • Breakwater Resources
  • 2006 Investment year results

2006

  • New Investment Stocks
  • Equitas
  • Berkshire Hathaway Third Quarter 2006
  • Hurricane Synergy
  • Berkshire Hathaway Second Quarter 2006
  • Fat Pitch
  • Perfectly Obvious
  • Berkshire Hathaway Growth Rate
  • Berkshire Hathaway First Quarter 2006
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report 2006
  • Inflation Is
  • 2005 Investment year results

2005

  • Exogenous Events
  • The Easy Money
  • Look-Through Earnings
  • High-Risk Mortgages
  • Unintended Consequences
  • Rydex Ursa Fund
  • Warren Buffett Premium
  • Private Equity
  • Latticework Mental Models
  • Buffett’s Lackluster Performance
  • 2004 Investment year results
  • Professor Smith’s Second Bubble

2004

  • Hedging Currency Disaster
  • Risk Assessment
  • Too Many Bears
  • The Chinese Century?
  • Patterned Irrationality
  • Timber
  • Costco’s Cash
  • Physics Envy by Charlie Munger
  • Asset Allocation Berkshire Hathaway
  • The Balance of Payments
  • 2003 Investment year results

2003

  • Hedge Funds
  • The trade deficit is not debt
  • Secular Bear Market
  • Which Index Funds?
  • A Different Drummer
  • Costco’s Float
  • The Power of Float
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting 2003
  • Psychology of Human Misjudgment
  • Sitting on the Sidelines
  • Berkshire Hathaway intrinsic value
  • 2002 Investment year results

2002

  • Insurance company Moats
  • Bond Bubble
  • Berkshire Hathaway Cash Flow 2002
  • Behavioral Economics
  • The Bear Market 2002
  • Greenspan Put
  • Second Quarter Cash Flow at Berkshire Hathaway
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting 2002
  • Red Wire – Green Wire
  • Stupid FED Tricks
  • The Bottom Line
  • 2001 Investment year results

2001

  • Don’t Fight the FED
  • Buy and Hold? – It all Depends
  • Ben Laden and Berkshire Hathaway
  • The Dinosaurs Dance
  • Costco Moat
  • Bubble Watching
  • Sit on your Ass investing
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting 2001
  • Carnival Cruise Lines
  • 450000 Square Ft Furniture Store
  • Lunch Money Indicators – Annual report
  • Other People’s Money

2000

  • Bear Tracks
  • Build It and Money Will Come
  • Efficient Stock Market
  • Style Drift
  • Lunch Money Indicators – Options
  • Identifying Problems
  • Small Retail Stocks
  • Charlie Munger comments
  • Big Al and the Bubble Machine
  • Berkshire Hathaway Cheap
  • Index Funds
  • 16 rules for investment success
Make an appointment or contact us by phone: +1 (689) 246 49 49
© 1999 - 2022 Losch Management Company
Support by Global AGM