• Home
  • About
  • Team
  • Contacts
  • Blog

Career Risk for Investment Manager

  1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. Career Risk for Inve ...

Portfolio manager’s Letter September 2009

What career risk for investment manager means

Career Risk for Investment Manager

Career Risk for investment manager has a significant impact on financial markets worldwide. With many trillions of dollars in the hands of professional investment managers, anything that impacts the psychology of this class is likely to move markets, and usually in ways that defy rational explanation.

If an investor is attempting to evaluate a potential investment manager or to manage his own money it is important to understand the psychology of the individual that is trying to make a living by managing money. The most important thing to keep in mind is that a investment manager’s performance is almost universally evaluated using short-term results. Most investors focus on short term results. They do not have patience that is required to outperform the market in the long term.

In the media, managers are compared using quarterly, monthly, or even daily returns, this manger creates pressure on managers to focus on short term performance, creates career risk for investment manager. As Seth Klarman said in a recent interview: “Managers who do well in the short term are rewarded with more assets,” he said. “Those who do not do well in the short term often don’t survive to see the long term”.

Career risk for investment manager means that investment managers are pressured by what their clients think or by what they believe their clients think. When an investment manger’s current performance is not up to his benchmark, the money will start to exit. This makes it difficult for an investment manager to focus on the long term, even if he would like to. The irony is that while the market place is selecting for the best short-term results, what the customer is really choosing is high risk and a poor long-term outcome.

For the investor managing his own money, the investment managers’ problems can be a blessing because the irrational behavior caused by the pressure for short term performance will create buying opportunities as money is sucked into hot stocks. This short-term investing bias is investor driven and is not likely to change. It increases market volatility, but represents little career risk for investment manager helps prolong bull markets and bear markets, and generally helps to create pricing inefficiencies.

Unless the investment manager has been meticulous in controlling expenses and cultivating clients with a long-term perspective, it will create career risk for investment manager, and it will hard to practice value investing. Value investing sounds easy, but done right requires a lot of patience. The marketplace seldom leaves an investment manager with that option. If his customers lack patience, the manager cannot afford to have it. The problems get more significant as the assets under management grow.

Size compounds the problems of money management, and increases career risk for investment manager for two reasons, first of all, size is an anchor to performance, and as a mutual fund gets bigger, its overhead expenses increase. It becomes more dependent on clients with short term objectives. This means that most huge mutual funds no longer try to outperform the market and instead become closet indexers.

Not all investment managers all equal when trying to judge the disadvantage of size. Mutual funds are more susceptible because their regulatory structure means they have high administrative costs which adds career risk for investment manager. RIAs may be less subject to this pressure if they have been able to keep their overhead low.

As for hedge funds, it is impossible to tell because they are no reliable industry-wide performance statistics. They have access to arcane stratagem and leverage that may give them some advantage. Still, until there is a regulation that requires reporting of performance and administrative cost on the same basis as other investment managers, we do not know if they will be able to achieve better results than other it represents career risk for investment manager.

A case could be made that investor pressure had something to do with Buffett closing his Partnerships in 1969 (he may have been getting pressure from partners to do things he did not want to do). This might seem unlikely, but anyone who attended Berkshire Hathaway annual meetings during the tech bubble knows that there was no shortage of mucks who would start up at the meeting, and explain to Buffett all the reasons he should be investing in wonderful bubble stocks.

Then when Buffett got back into investing in the seventies, it was through a vehicle where he did not have to pay a lot of attention to investors. The advantage of the corporate structure being that since he owned the controlling interest in the corporation, there would never be any career risk for investment manager.

For the investor considering hiring a investment manager, large size is not just an anchor, but is likely eliminate any chance that the investment manager can outperform the market. Buffett seems to do quite well with a $70 plus billion, but a doubt there are other managers that can handle this size portfolio and still beat the market.

I do not think that any Big Cap (Over $20 billion) mutual fund will outperform the market over the long term so size creates career risk for investment manager. Or at least the odds are small enough that I would recommend that all money that is currently in this type of vehicle would be better off in an index fund or in Berkshire Hathaway. I have a huge preference for Berkshire Hathaway because I feel it has less risk and much more potential than any large mutual fund, managed, or index.

Finally, an investor picking an investment manager based on short term performance can expect poor results. Using the best six months, one year or three-year record is sending money into the current market fad and will increase the investor’s exposure to risk, and generate career risk for investment manager. Yet Individuals are encouraged to make this kind of choice by the media’s obsession with short term results. It is essential to accept that short term behavior is market-driven and that learning to avoid it is a crucial step in improving your investment performance.

09/01/2009



Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Comment


Name

Email

Url


Blog Archive

2020

  • The Stock Market

2019

  • Behavioral Investing

2018

  • Trumped
  • Warren Buffett vs Wall Street
  • Globalism, 1982-2000 Bull Market

2017

  • Volatility Underlying Calm Market
  • What’s new with CB&I?
  • Passive Investing
  • Economic Cycles
  • Current Stock Market 2017 Comment

2016

  • Global Plastics Summit Highlights
  • Value Investing vs Index Investing
  • How to Play an Index Bubble
  • Successful Investors
  • Is the Market Overvalued?
  • Operating Earnings
  • Article by investment manager in Bay Hill Living
  • Building Foundation

2015

  • 3G Culture – Dream Big
  • Myopic Loss Aversion
  • CBI Nuclear Energy
  • St Joe Company
  • What’s in a Word? Plastics.
  • Are Bonds Safer Than Stocks?

2014

  • Chicago Bridge and Iron
  • CAMEX 2014
  • Global Economy October 2014
  • Fluor Corporation
  • Interesting Quotes from Daily Journal Annual Meeting
  • The Daily Journal Annual Meeting
  • Albemarle Corporation
  • Triumph Group
  • The American Energy Revolution
  • Singapore

2013

  • St Joe Company Update
  • Hedge Fund Managers
  • Triumph Group Inc.
  • Bitter Brew
  • An Antifragile Portfolio

2012

  • Leucadia National Corporation
  • This Time it is Different
  • Successful traders psychology
  • St Joe Company
  • Learning from Pain

2011

  • Long Cycles – Part II
  • Long Cycle
  • Nasty Month for Market
  • Make a Buck with Fortescue Metals Group
  • Berkshire Hathaway Look Through Earnings
  • St Joe Company Inc
  • Successful Investment Management
  • A Look Into Latin American Market
  • The Mother of all Quarters
  • 2010 Investment year results

2010

  • Fault Lines
  • US Market 2010
  • Berkshire Hathaway Third Quarter 2010
  • The Stock Market 2010
  • Berkshire Hathaway Second Quarter 2010
  • Berkshire Hathaway Performance
  • Long Term Greedy
  • Goldman Sachs
  • Berkadia and Leucadia
  • USG corporation
  • Berkshire Hathaway 2009 2010
  • Why Capitalism Works

2009

  • The Lords of Finance
  • The $44 Billion Dollar Train Set
  • Berkshire Hathaway 3rd Quarter 2009
  • Career Risk for Investment Manager
  • Berkshire Hathaway financial statements
  • Berkshire Hathaway Preferred Stock
  • Moral Hazard
  • Credit Default Swap
  • The Shadow Banking System
  • Learning Things the Hard Way
  • Our C-System
  • 2008 Investment results

2008

  • Investment Risk
  • Bear Markets
  • Generational Events
  • Orange sheets – Money is doing better
  • Inflation Not The Problem
  • Tipping Point
  • Long Term Capital Management
  • Financial Insurance
  • Western Refining Inc
  • Berkshire Hathaway Year To Date
  • Berkshire Hathaway Cash Flow
  • 2007 investment results

2007

  • Investment results 4th Quarter 2007
  • Greenspan on Inflation
  • Berkshire Hathaway Third Quarter 2007
  • Berkshire Hathaway Operating income 2007
  • Berkshire Hathaway Hedge Fund
  • Leveraged Buyouts
  • Stability Unstable
  • Weak Dollar
  • Berkshire Hathaway Chairman’s Letter
  • Steel Dynamics
  • Breakwater Resources
  • 2006 Investment year results

2006

  • New Investment Stocks
  • Equitas
  • Berkshire Hathaway Third Quarter 2006
  • Hurricane Synergy
  • Berkshire Hathaway Second Quarter 2006
  • Fat Pitch
  • Perfectly Obvious
  • Berkshire Hathaway Growth Rate
  • Berkshire Hathaway First Quarter 2006
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report 2006
  • Inflation Is
  • 2005 Investment year results

2005

  • Exogenous Events
  • The Easy Money
  • Look-Through Earnings
  • High-Risk Mortgages
  • Unintended Consequences
  • Rydex Ursa Fund
  • Warren Buffett Premium
  • Private Equity
  • Latticework Mental Models
  • Buffett’s Lackluster Performance
  • 2004 Investment year results
  • Professor Smith’s Second Bubble

2004

  • Hedging Currency Disaster
  • Risk Assessment
  • Too Many Bears
  • The Chinese Century?
  • Patterned Irrationality
  • Timber
  • Costco’s Cash
  • Physics Envy by Charlie Munger
  • Asset Allocation Berkshire Hathaway
  • The Balance of Payments
  • 2003 Investment year results

2003

  • Hedge Funds
  • The trade deficit is not debt
  • Secular Bear Market
  • Which Index Funds?
  • A Different Drummer
  • Costco’s Float
  • The Power of Float
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting 2003
  • Psychology of Human Misjudgment
  • Sitting on the Sidelines
  • Berkshire Hathaway intrinsic value
  • 2002 Investment year results

2002

  • Insurance company Moats
  • Bond Bubble
  • Berkshire Hathaway Cash Flow 2002
  • Behavioral Economics
  • The Bear Market 2002
  • Greenspan Put
  • Second Quarter Cash Flow at Berkshire Hathaway
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting 2002
  • Red Wire – Green Wire
  • Stupid FED Tricks
  • The Bottom Line
  • 2001 Investment year results

2001

  • Don’t Fight the FED
  • Buy and Hold? – It all Depends
  • Ben Laden and Berkshire Hathaway
  • The Dinosaurs Dance
  • Costco Moat
  • Bubble Watching
  • Sit on your Ass investing
  • Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting 2001
  • Carnival Cruise Lines
  • 450000 Square Ft Furniture Store
  • Lunch Money Indicators – Annual report
  • Other People’s Money

2000

  • Bear Tracks
  • Build It and Money Will Come
  • Efficient Stock Market
  • Style Drift
  • Lunch Money Indicators – Options
  • Identifying Problems
  • Small Retail Stocks
  • Charlie Munger comments
  • Big Al and the Bubble Machine
  • Berkshire Hathaway Cheap
  • Index Funds
  • 16 rules for investment success
Make an appointment or contact us by phone: +1 (689) 246 49 49
© 1999 - 2022 Losch Management Company
Support by Global AGM